Chinese ASAT vs US Orbital Rendezvous

A comparison of the Chinese ASAT test and the US orbital rendezvous and docking test makes an interesting contrast, to some extent even reversing some racial stereotypes often applied to Asians and the USA.

The Chinese military's January 11 pretentious demonstration of ASAT capability consisted of blasting the disused Chinese Feng Yun 1C satellite into hazardous fragments.

A few months later subcontractors of DARPA in the USA completed a beautifully executed demonstration of the mastery of space that I suspect has been tailored as a response to the Chinese test, shown to the rest of the world complete with video evidence stitched together from photos taken during the mission (unfortunately I am unable to see it because it is on a .mil site that presumably blocks page reads from outside the US, although I previously saw a clip on, I think, the space.com site).

So now, even if the Chinese can blast entire flotillas of satellites into smithereens and make LEO virtually unusable, for now only the US is capable of making an 'ASTRO' satellite that can gently float up to another satellite, photograph it, refuel it and otherwise service it, or alternatively spin it up, push it into a useless orbit or deorbit it altogether, all without affecting the surrounding space environment in the slightest.

Of course the specific purpose of the ongoing tests is to develop an in orbit servicing capability that will greatly increase the lifespan of satellites and reduce costs. However, the goals of this mission and the was clearly not formulated in a vacuum, if you'll excuse the pun. There is no doubt in my mind that DARPA has identified satellite manouverability, and rendezvous capability as a high priority need, partly as a result of ASAT research in foreign countries.

Nevertheless, in order to have full control of LEO, the DOD really needs rapid access to space (or Operationally Responsive Space capability) in order to ensure the necessary hardware can be put in place when needed. It is to be hoped that a future Presidental administration realize the importance of this, and the wrong headedness of pursuing an unenforceable treaty prohibiting ASAT technology when they are so close to the goal of complete mastery of near Earth space.